Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденция Синергия

КОМПЕТЕНТНЫЙ ТЕСТ С ОТВЕТАМИ Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденция 90+

Susan is an Asian-American. She wanted to continue her studies at a local public college but her application was rejected. Susan has grounds to suppose that it was because of her ethnic origin. She filed suit against the college. What law is applied in such a case?

Mary had therapy sessions. She found out that the psychologist sent copies of her case notes to the insurance carrier responsible for reimbursement and that therapist should not have revealed this information. Client reported psychologist to the APA Ethics Committee for violating confidentiality principles. Psychologist explained to Ethics Committee that any client understands that their confidentiality may be breached when using an insurance company for third-party reimbursement due to administrative and professional peer review. Nonetheless, psychologist never informed client of this risk before therapy began, rather, he assumed client must understand the protocol. Think of the Ethics Committee adjudication.

The distinction between Public and Private Law is a purely academic debate, nevertheless, it also affects legal practice. There are areas of law, which may not fit into distinction of Public or Private Law. Study the following case: An employment inspector investigates workplace safety, checking all the equipment. The inspector investigates workplace incidents, and conducts workplace inspections to evaluate compliance. Decide whether it falls into the category of Public or Private law.

Susan buys a cup of coffee and accidentally spills it at Kates bar. What must Kate do to fix the problem?

Analyze the following case: Therapist sent a third billing notice to a slow-to- pay clients fax machine in her office but client did not report to work that day. The bill was titled psychological services rendered and handwritten in large print was Third Notice – OVERDUE!! with clients name. This notice sat in an open access mail tray of the busy office all day. Was is reasonable? Is it allowed to send private material in such a manner?

Rachel buys a commercial welding machine for her building business. A few weeks later, it breaks down. Can Rachel get a remedy from the store he bought it from?

Common-law legal systems place great value on deciding cases according to consistent principled rules, so that similar facts will yield similar and predictable outcomes, and observance of precedent is the mechanism by which that goal is attained. What is the guiding principle of Common-law legal systems? What is the idea behind?

You are a lawyer. In Lizas electronics shop in the Russia Federation Ivan buys an expensive TV-set. Three weeks after the 12-month manufacturers warranty expires, the TV-set stops working. Must Liza give Ivan a remedy?

Judy owns a clothing retail store. One of her customers returns a T-shirt because it doesnt fit her. Does Judy have to give her customer a different size or a refund?

Meghan is an interior designer. A supplier installs a gondola incorrectly and it breaks a month later. Who must fix the problem?

Imagine that in 2024 you will be president of your country. What branch will you represent? What will be your powers?

Ben, who is 19 years old, applies for a job as a clerk in a goods store. The store manager is impressed with Bens speaking skills and says that he would like to hire him, subject to reference checks. Later, the manager calls Ben and says that he will not be hired. On checking his references with a former employer, the manager found out that Ben was convicted of careless driving. Has the store manager violated Bens human rights by refusing to hire him?

Stacy and several of her friends play in a womens hockey league at the skate rink. Quite frequently, the male rink attendants dont give them their full allotted ice time. The attendants make jokes on the women. Stacy thinks that their rights are violated. She has even complained but the manager has done nothing and supported men. Have the rink attendants violated the young womens human rights?

The defendant had voluntarily consumed drugs to calm his nerves. Under the influence of the drugs, he had started shooting in the cottage in which he had been living, but claimed to have been unable to remember anything after taking the drugs. The defendant was convicted of causing criminal damage being reckless as to whether life would be endangered, following the trial judges direction to the jury that self-induced intoxication was not available by way of defence to a basic intent crime. The defendant appealed. What is the Courts decision?

The constitution is the main legal act of the State. It lays down the formation of a system of society and establishes the state structure, the order and justification of the idea of representatives, executive and judicial authorities, the electoral system, the rights and obligations of the state, society and citizens. Can it be argued that any constitution is the constitution of a state or society exclusively?

The defendant decided to kill his sister. He bought a knife and a bottle of strong alcohol which he drank to give himself Dutch Courage. Then he killed his sister. He subsequently claimed that he was so drunk that he did not know what he was doing, or possibly even that the drink had brought on a latent psychopathic state so that he was insane at the time of the killing. What was the Courts decision