заказывала работу по шизофрении. профессор выслал ее обратно, с комментариями в самой работе и в письме. нужно сделать работу над ошибками.
Введение, заключение, в конце работы нужен список литературы, работа по стандарту АРА, и в самой работе если что то взято из интернета или статей или книг надо указывать сразу.
The paper is generally informative and contains many valuable ideas. It also shows that you are interested in the topic and read many articles and some books in order to deepen your knowledge.
Unfortunately, many of the works you quote do not pertain to the standard literature of S. in Europe and the USA: Russian authors, blogs and further internet quotations should be replaced by well-known works I quoted in my lectures. Besides, you seem not to have followed my lectures, for much information is missing.
For example in the chapter "Etiology" the biological (e.g. Dopamine hypothesis) and the psychosocial (e.g. the "schizophrenogenic mother" and the double-bind hypotheses) are not mentioned. In both etiology and therapy you seem to stress the medical and behavioral view; your personal preference should not, however, lead you to neglect other aspects and views in a general paper.
Unfortunately, the list of references is sloppy: some of the quoted works are missing, others are not in an alphabetic order. It would be of advantage, too, if you had your paper read through by a native speaker to correct punctuation and some unclear sentences.